The duties usually fall on services
The Online Safety Act primarily regulates providers of in-scope user-to-user and search services. It does not turn every user into a legal compliance expert.
Protection, evidence and public rules
Online safety law places duties on certain online services and gives regulators powers to supervise compliance. It can change platform systems, reporting routes and accountability. But it does not make every online interaction safe or guarantee that individual losses will be prevented or reimbursed.
Treat regulation as an extra layer of protection, not proof that a post, advert, account or search result is genuine. Continue to verify the person, request and route, and report harmful or fraudulent content through the service and the appropriate public route.
Start with Key Guidance for the short answer. Then read the sections that match what happened and what you need to do.
Understand the issue
Legal duties are often described in broad headlines. The practical effect depends on which service is covered, which duty has commenced, the risk on that service and the measures required or adopted.
The Online Safety Act primarily regulates providers of in-scope user-to-user and search services. It does not turn every user into a legal compliance expert.
In-scope services must assess relevant illegal-content risks and take proportionate measures, including risks connected with fraud and financial-services offences.
Risk assessments, safety measures, children’s protections and extra duties for categorised services do not all begin at the same time.
A regulated platform can still contain harmful material, false accounts or misleading adverts. Presence on the service is not an endorsement.
Consequences and movement
Separate the law itself, Ofcom’s codes and guidance, the duties currently in force and proposals that are still being consulted on.
Providers must understand how their design, users, algorithms, business model and features may create or increase illegal harm.
Measures can concern moderation, reporting, complaints, recommender systems, user controls, governance and other parts of service design.
The regulator can request information, investigate and take enforcement action where regulated services do not meet applicable duties.
Platform reporting, fraud reporting, banking complaints and reimbursement processes continue to serve different purposes.
Practical response
Use regulation to understand responsibility and reporting—not as a substitute for checking the immediate situation.
Look more closely
Rules can improve services, reporting and accountability without making every contact inside a regulated environment genuine. The identity, authority, destination and requested action still require an independent check.
A search result, post, advert, message or account creates contact.
Relevance, urgency, opportunity or fear makes the content matter.
Platform presence, verification symbols or professional presentation can borrow legitimacy.
The user is moved toward a controlled link, conversation, payment or disclosure.
Independent verification and reporting protect the individual while regulation addresses the wider environment.
Ofcom published draft codes for extra duties applying to certain large categorised services. These are proposals under consultation, distinct from the illegal-content safety duties already in force.
Read the Ofcom consultationThe consultation is an implementation step, not a declaration that every paid advert is now checked or that every loss will be refunded.
Illegal-content safety duties have applied since 17 March 2025 to in-scope services, including proportionate measures for priority illegal harms.
The 2026 consultation concerns paid-for fraudulent advertising duties for Category 1 and Category 2A services.
User-generated illegal content, search results and paid advertising can fall under different provisions and implementation stages.
Users should still verify adverts and report suspicious content. The proposal does not certify individual advertisements.
When describing a new rule, identify whether it is law, an active duty, a code, guidance or a proposal. That distinction determines what the public can reasonably expect today.
Selected history
The Act confirmed the statutory framework for regulating in-scope online services and gave Ofcom the online-safety role.
Lasting lesson: The Act is the framework. Practical duties depend on commencement, codes, guidance and the type of service.
In-scope platforms were required to implement appropriate measures to address illegal material and priority criminal activity.
Lasting lesson: Commencement is more useful to the public than treating the Act’s original passage date as the date every protection began.
Transferable understanding
They have different legal status and roles in explaining or demonstrating compliance.
A duty on a service does not transfer blame to the user, nor remove the value of immediate protective action.
One report may remove one item. Repeated evidence can reveal a wider failure in systems or complaints handling.
A new proposal or phase may be presented as though every relevant harm has already been eliminated.
Plain-language answers
Report the content to the service, preserve the evidence and use the relevant fraud, banking or cyber route for personal effects. Ofcom’s public information explains what regulated services must do.
Scamology Insights
These apps, tools, books and courses can help you separate the trust created by a regulated setting from the evidence for one particular claim, person or contact method. Links are intentionally withheld in this production version.
Continue understanding
Evidence and currency